It's time to build

User profile image

Delegating 101 ARB to:

webtc.eth

User profile image
It's time to build

Delegating 101 ARB to:

webtc.eth

Crypto Never Dies, Web3 Is Coming... We owe the past, and the future. It’s time to be a Techno-Optimist. It’s time to build ZK.

0x631a...A587

Arbitrum Delegation Statement

Crypto Never Die

   –webtc.eth in web3, a decentralized believer

Name: Oasis (Individual)

ENS: webtc.eth

Address:0x631ab8EB40588543dF900263F864b6376d56A587

Tally: Tally | webtc.eth

Areas of interest:

  • DeFi development on Arbitrum

  • Gaming development on Arbitrum

Please share your stance on overall goals for the DAO:

I don’t want to talk too much high-sounding nonsense, I just want to say that I am an ordinary but real web3 user and a believer in decentralization. Although I don’t have much money, I will always vote on behalf of the interests of ordinary users, and at the same time better conform to the spirit of crypto!

Hope ARB becomes the most successful L2! LFG!

Sample Voting Issue 1 - UniSwap/Flipside Bounty

How would you vote?

No

Decentralization is the charm of the blockchain, we cannot compromise because of short-term interests!

What amendments would you make to the proposal if any?

  • We should try to avoid situations where voting rights are controlled by a few organizations!

How would you approach the tradeoff between centralization of authority and the ability to get things done?

Power can be concentrated, but it must be restrained!

The tradeoff between centralization of authority and the ability to get things done is a classic dilemma in organizational management. Centralization can lead to faster decision-making, more efficient resource allocation, and a stronger sense of direction and unity, but it can also stifle innovation, creativity, and flexibility. On the other hand, decentralization can foster experimentation, diversity, and adaptability, but it can also result in slower decision-making, duplication of effort, and weaker coordination.

The key is to strike a balance between centralization and decentralization that fits the specific context and goals of the organization. Factors that may influence this balance include the size and complexity of the organization, the level of expertise and trust of its members, the nature of its tasks and challenges, the degree of external pressure and competition, and the values and culture of its stakeholders.

In practice, organizations may adopt different degrees and forms of centralization and decentralization depending on the situation. For example, they may delegate decision-making authority to lower levels while retaining strategic control at the top, or they may empower teams or individuals to make decisions within certain boundaries while providing guidance and support from above.

Ultimately, the key to a successful balance between centralization and decentralization is to maintain effective communication, feedback, and learning mechanisms that allow the organization to adapt and evolve over time.

Sample Voting Issue 2 - Rari Hack Reinbursement

We need to choose according to the specific situation. If the loss is within the range that the project party can bear and it is not the user’s fault, I think it should be Full Reimbursement in this case. If the project party is beyond its capabilities, I think it can be paid in installments!

Languages I speak and write: By order of preference - English, Chinese, Portuguese

Disclosure of Conflict(s) of Interest:

I conduct my business in the best interests of Arbitrum, and I have no conflict of interest that would prevent me from using my best judgment to advance Arbitrum’s best interests in the arbitration ecosystem.

Crypto Never Die, believe me, pls

This information was sourced from https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/31/530


ProposalVotes forVotes againstVoted?

206.39M

8.67M

No vote

193.12M

4.05K

No vote

193.92M

266.93K

No vote

247.89M

362.6K

No vote

263.67M

16K

No vote